swansont

It’s physics. Lots of abstract things in physics. Which is not what physics does. It tells us how nature behaves. The nature of reality is philosophy. How do you empirically test whether you’ve described the nature of reality? As opposed to something else, like Plato’s allegory of the cave?

! Moderator Note I have removed your links. Posting something as facebook or instagram doesn’t tell anyone what the link actually is, and what we’re looking for is some kind of scientific study, not a dozen random people saying something. This is a science discussion site. Anecdotes aren’t data. And, as I said, advertising is against the rules. Thread closed.

“Citation needed” should not be ignored. It’s a reasonable request that you support a claim, and failure to do so makes your post soapboxing. There’s a conversation to be had about the pros and cons of profit-driven research, but griping is not going to work.

! Moderator Note Advertising is not permitted here. Link removed Further, claiming that “many psychiatrists believe that scientists' work is useless, that science itself is pointless, and that no one needs to do anything” absolutely requires supporting material.

popularized, not coined “The term "bug" has been used in engineering and electronics for a while before the era of modern computing. Notable inventor Thomas Edison is known to have used the term "bug" to describe a technical malfunction in his works in the late 19th century, as noted in Princeton's Thomas Edison Papers.” https://www.dbvis.com/thetable/why-are-they-called-bugs/

Several of your equations do not appear to be dimensionally consistent. And you have variables that are not well-defined. Giving actual solutions to a common problem using them (with numbers and units) would be very helpful. And there’s a whole lot of word salad.

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=venezuela+corruption

Citation needed True for most for-profit research Generics are generally much cheaper than the patented drugs were before the patent expired.

Or how earthquakes are no big deal in some parts of the world because barely anybody dies.

Lower cancer rate and probably less infrastructure. Can’t really spend on cancer research if you don’t have research facilities and staff to run them, and train researchers.

Let’s see your calculation, then. That’s not what your equations say. You claim that “mass increases due to strong and gravitational potentials, while it decreases due to Electromagnetic potential” so why is it that the mass of deuterium is smaller than the mass of a proton + neutron?

! Moderator Note 1. There’s no models supporting any of this, so there’s not enough for this to be discussed in speculations 2. One idea per topic is a much better approach; this is a discussion forum, and multiple ideas make for messy discussions

I don’t accept that this is a true statement. What do you mean by “cells prepared in the laboratory”? It’s a very vague description. in vitro cell preparation, for example, uses living cells.

Exactly. And something that can’t be sourced in the 100+ years it takes to get to market. Nothing like investing a fortune only to have the bottom drop out of the market before your ship (or your descendants’) delivers because you found a local asteroid that’s rich in mithril. Interstellar law will be interesting, settling all of the bankruptcy claims from companies going belly-up while there’s cargo in transit. Futures trading in the commodities markets, too. The one advantage for importing/exporting Zebulon 7 wine is that will age enroute.

A lot of time and effort went into updating code and testing it, but nobody could be sure all problems were caught. Hence expanded scrutiny when things went live. Plus, if you were working insurance claims, you would have been handling issues from other people possibly not fixing all the problems. It’s no different than putting extra staff on duty after a hurricane or tornado. You don’t know how much damage will happen, and being swamped/unresponsive is ultimately bad for business.